Anstey's Romance of Bible Chronology

This classic work on Biblical Chronology is probably the best currently available on the subject. It retains its authority in respect of its detailed and scholarly analysis of the historical dates set forth in the Bible.  It provides definitive solutions for chronological controversies - like the length of the soujourn in Egypt - which continue to recur with monotonous regularity in modern creationist writings. It usefully critiques the chronologies of earlier chronologers like Scaliger and Ussher. Its main weakness for the modern reader is its outdated attempt to correlate these Biblical determined dates with archaeology, which is based on archaeological interpretations which now known to be incorrect, and its espousal of the discredited "Gap Theory" explanation for the geological record.
 

Anstey is in 2 volumes, the first is the text, the second is the tables.  The material is available in the following file formats (other previously available formats have been withdrawn as unsuitable for modern websites):


The Gap Theory places a very long time "gap" between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2, in an attempt to reconcile the "long ages" of conventional uniformitarian Historical Geology with the literal integrity of the Bible. During this period the geology of the earth was supposedly formed, together with the fossils, which represented the destruction of pre-Adamic races men and animals - many of which are, of course, remarkably similar to modern species! According to this theory, the world described as created in the rest of Genesis 1 constitutes a re-creation. Its major theological weakness is that, given that human fossils are found in the fossil record, it is impossible to reconcile with Romans 5:12-14, which says that human death only entered the world as a result of the sin of Adam. The Gap Theory, though less popular than it once was, still has adherents, usually people who wish to maintain the truth of the Bible and of accepted science. In fact the theory is an accommodation entirely towards science. This is unnecessary: recent geological studies show that the long ages of Historical Geology do not exist, and the rocks and fossil record are better explained by the Genesis Flood and the several centuries of ecological recovery that followed. 

© R H Johnston, 1998. All the material on this site is subject to copyright restrictions. You may make COMPLETE copies for yourself, but you may not alter the material or publish it in whole or in part without our written permission.

This page last edited March 2007

Amen Home Page